Companies that declare a dividend late in one calendar year, might pay it early in the next calendar year.
This page will show both dividends declared per year, as well as dividends paid per year,
in case the latter makes it look as if there was a freeze or a decrease.
The second column shows dividends declared per year.
The third column shows the increase in dividends declared from one year to the next.
The fourth column shows dividends paid per year.
The fifth column shows the increase in dividends paid from one year to the next.
| Year | Dividends declared | Increase from previous year | Dividends paid | Increase from previous year | CAGR to 2012 from | Bumpiness to 2012 from |
| 1978 | $ 0.28750 | | $ 0.27500 | | 0.447% | 73
|
| 1979 | $ 0.35000 | 21.739% | $ 0.33750 | 22.727% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 1980 | $ 0.36250 | 3.571% | $ 0.35625 | 5.556% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 1981 | $ 0.37500 | 3.448% | $ 0.37500 | 5.263% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 1982 | $ 0.37500 | NO CHANGE | $ 0.37500 | NO CHANGE | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 1983 | $ 0.38625 | 3.000% | $ 0.37500 | NO CHANGE | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 1984 | $ 0.43000 | 11.327% | $ 0.42000 | 12.000% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 1985 | $ 0.47000 | 9.302% | $ 0.46000 | 9.524% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 1986 | $ 0.51000 | 8.511% | $ 0.50000 | 8.696% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 1987 | $ 0.55250 | 8.333% | $ 0.54000 | 8.000% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 1988 | $ 0.59750 | 8.145% | $ 0.59000 | 9.259% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 1989 | $ 0.62750 | 5.021% | $ 0.62000 | 5.085% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 1990 | $ 0.65750 | 4.781% | $ 0.65000 | 4.839% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 1991 | $ 0.69250 | 5.323% | $ 0.68000 | 4.615% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 1992 | $ 0.73750 | 6.498% | $ 0.73000 | 7.353% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 1993 | $ 0.77500 | 5.085% | $ 0.76000 | 4.110% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 1994 | $ 0.83000 | 7.097% | $ 0.82000 | 7.895% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 1995 | $ 0.87500 | 5.422% | $ 0.86000 | 4.878% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 1996 | $ 0.93500 | 6.857% | $ 0.92000 | 6.977% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 1997 | $ 0.99500 | 6.417% | $ 0.98000 | 6.522% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 1998 | $ 1.05500 | 6.030% | $ 1.04000 | 6.122% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 1999 | $ 0.82500 | DECREASE | $ 1.10000 | 5.769% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 2000 | $ 1.46500 | 77.576% | $ 1.16000 | 5.455% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 2001 | $ 1.23500 | DECREASE | $ 1.22000 | 5.172% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 2002 | $ 1.29500 | 4.858% | $ 1.28000 | 4.918% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 2003 | $ 1.35500 | 4.633% | $ 1.34000 | 4.688% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 2004 | $ 1.41500 | 4.428% | $ 1.40000 | 4.478% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 2005 | $ 1.47500 | 4.240% | $ 1.46000 | 4.286% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 2006 | $ 1.53500 | 4.068% | $ 1.52000 | 4.110% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 2007 | $ 1.60000 | 4.235% | $ 1.58000 | 3.947% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 2008 | $ 1.45500 | DECREASE | $ 1.66000 | 5.063% | The dividend for 2012 was less than the dividend for this year | There is no useful bumpiness for this year |
| 2009 | $ 0.04000 | DECREASE | $ 0.24000 | DECREASE | 10.064% | 233
|
| 2010 | $ 0.08000 | 100.000% | $ 0.04000 | DECREASE | 182.843% | 176
|
| 2011 | $ 0.23000 | 187.500% | $ 0.20000 | 400.000% | 60.000% | 0
|
| 2012 | $ 0.36000 | 56.522% | $ 0.32000 | 60.000% | | |